

Yes
I do.

No
I don’t.
President Donald Trump is dramatically increasing economic pressure on Iran as his administration attempts to force Tehran to change course without relying solely on military power.
The White House has shifted renewed attention toward sanctions, financial restrictions and pressure on Iranian oil exports. The strategy resembles the “maximum pressure” campaign Trump pursued during his first administration, although the current confrontation is unfolding under very different circumstances.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has described the new phase as an “endgame” and said the United States intends to sever Iran’s remaining economic lifelines.
Trump believes that kind of pressure can force Tehran to make concessions.
There are signs that Iran is dealing with serious economic problems. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has publicly acknowledged difficulties involving inflation, unemployment and declining living standards as American sanctions intensify.
However, Iranian officials are publicly rejecting the idea that they are intimidated.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi dismissed Washington’s latest economic campaign and insisted Iran has seen this strategy before. Other Iranian officials say Tehran has prepared plans to counter additional American economic pressure.
That creates two very different pictures.
The Trump administration argues that Iran’s economy is becoming increasingly vulnerable and that sustained financial pressure can deprive Tehran of the resources it needs while giving Iranian leaders a powerful incentive to negotiate.
Iran’s government, meanwhile, is attempting to project defiance and convince both its own population and the outside world that it can withstand Washington’s pressure.
The truth may ultimately depend on what happens next.
Economic sanctions rarely produce their full impact overnight. Their effectiveness can depend on enforcement, international cooperation, oil markets, Iran’s trading partners and Tehran’s ability to find alternative sources of revenue.
Trump has nevertheless made economic power a central weapon in his approach to Iran. Rather than backing away, his administration is signaling that the pressure could become considerably stronger.
If Iran eventually changes course or returns to negotiations on terms favorable to Washington, Trump could point to the outcome as evidence that his strategy worked. If Tehran withstands the pressure, critics will argue that sanctions alone were insufficient.